Holiness: In the Year King Uzziah Died.

“In the year that King Uzziah died I saw the Lord sitting upon a throne, high and lifted up; and the train of his robe filled the temple.” (Isaiah 6:1)

Understanding the subject of holiness brings us to an understanding of who God is. As we begin studying Isaiah 6:1-7, we initially see that God is eternally sovereign. This is in contrast to Judah’s King Uzziah who ruled for 52 years, certainly a lengthy reign for any human monarch, but which pales in comparison to the Lord’s rule and reign.

The text begins by saying, “In the year that King Uzziah died.” The year was 739 B.C. Uzziah’s death was ultimately caused by leprosy. While leprosy was a common skin disease in the ancient world and which was perceived as highly contagious, Uzziah’s condition was a direct judgment from the Lord. 2 Chronicles 26:16 states, “But when he (Uzziah) became strong, his heart was so proud that he acted corruptly, and he was unfaithful to the LORD his God, for he entered the temple of the LORD to burn incense on the altar of incense.”

Dr. John MacArthur writes that, “Uzziah attempted to usurp the role of the priest, which is forbidden in the Leviticus code (law). See Numbers 13:10; 18:7. Proverbs 16:18 indicates that pride precipitates a fall, and it did in his case. Even the king could not live above God’s law”

 Following the death of a king who had such a lengthy and prosperous rule must have prompted the Prophet Isaiah perhaps to seek the Lord for guidance with respect to the then current, and future, well-being of the Nation of Judah. The prophet encountered much more than he could have anticipated.

I saw the Lord.” Isaiah personally perceived, observed and was attentive to the Lord. The English rendering “Lord” is in reference to the Hebrew title Adonai, which means Master and sovereign One. It is a title for God’s sovereign deity focusing on His authority and majesty as ruler of the universe.

The question is asked, “How could Isaiah see God, who is Spirit (John 4:24)? How could God be seen in a visible shape? John Calvin comments that, “We ought to be aware that when God exhibited Himself to the view of the Fathers, He never appeared such as He actually is but such as the capacity of men could receive. God comes down to them in such a manner as to cause some kind of mirror to reflect the rays to His glory. There was, therefore, exhibited to Isaiah such a form as enabled him, according to his capacity, to perceive the inconceivable majesty of God; and thus he attributes to God a throne, a robe and a bodily appearance.”

 Who exactly was the Lord that Isaiah saw? The principle of Scripture interpreting Scripture is very applicable here because John 12:39-41 says, 39 Therefore they could not believe. For again Isaiah said, 40 “He has blinded their eyes and hardened their heart, lest they see with their eyes, and understand with their heart, and turn, and I would heal them.” 41 Isaiah said these things because he saw his glory and spoke of him.” Isaiah saw the pre-incarnate glory of Jesus Christ, who as the second person of the Godhead is the image of the invisible God (Colossians 1:15).

Isaiah then mentions three things about the Lord who he saw. The Lord was “sitting upon a throne, high and lifted up; and the train of his robe filled the temple.”

First, what does “sitting upon a throne” mean? The word “sitting” is an active participle and it means dwelling and abiding. It figuratively refers to God’s royal dignity, authority, and power. He is sovereignly in control.

Second, what does “high and lifted up” mean? Other similar words include lofty and exalted. Judah’s King Uzziah may have occupied a lofty position as king, but there is no one more highly exalted than the Lord. In other words, the LORD is worthy of all praise.

Third, what does “and the train of his robe filled the temple” mean? Unlike King Uzziah who died an unhealthy and segregated death because of his diseased body, the Lord is eternally healthy, valued, satisfying and strong. The robe is an extension of His personhood. God’s person appears in the temple, which is where He said that He would meet His people (I Kings 8) so they would know that everything they have is from the Lord (James 1:17). There is no place within the temple which He is not present.

Dr. John Walvoord explains that, “Three things struck Isaiah about God: He was seated on a throne, He was high and exalted, and the train of His robe filled the temple. In the most holy place of the temple in Jerusalem, God’s glory was evident between the cherubim on the atonement cover over the Ark of the Covenant. Therefore some Israelites may have erroneously thought that God was fairly small. However, Solomon, in his dedicatory prayer for the new temple, had stated that no temple could contain God and that in fact even the heavens could not contain Him (1 Kings 8:27). Therefore Isaiah did not see God on the Ark of the Covenant, but on a throne. Almost 150 years later Ezekiel had a similar experience. He envisioned God being borne along on a great chariot throne by living creatures called cherubim (Ezek. 1). To Isaiah, the throne emphasized that the Lord is indeed the true King of Israel.”

Not only would Isaiah would see the Lord, but also he could hear something about the Lord. That is what we will consider when next we meet.

Soli deo Gloria!

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The Belgic Confession: Lord’s Day 14.

On each Lord’s Day this year, we will reproduce devotional articles taken from The Belgic Confession. The Belgic Confession, written in 1561, owes its origin to the need for a clear and comprehensive statement of Reformed Theology during the time of the Spanish inquisition in the Lowlands. Guido de Brès, its primary author, was pleading for understanding and toleration from King Philip II of Spain who was determined to root out all Protestant factions in his jurisdiction. Hence, this confession takes pains to point out the continuity of Reformed Theology with that of the ancient Christian creeds.

The oldest of the doctrinal standards of the Christian Reformed Church and the Reformed Church in America is the Confession of Faith, popularly known as the Belgic Confession, following the seventeenth-century Latin designation “Confessio Belgica.” “Belgica” referred to the whole of the Netherlands, both north and south, which today is divided into the Netherlands and Belgium. The confession’s chief author was Guido de Brès, a preacher of the Reformed churches of the Netherlands, who died a martyr to the faith in the year 1567.

During the sixteenth century the churches in this country were exposed to terrible persecution by the Roman Catholic government. To protest against this cruel oppression, and to prove to the persecutors that the adherents of the Reformed faith were not rebels, as was laid to their charge, but law-abiding citizens who professed the true Christian doctrine according to the Holy Scriptures, de Brès prepared this confession in the year 1561. In the following year a copy was sent to King Philip II, together with an address in which the petitioners declared that they were ready to obey the government in all lawful things, but that they would “offer their backs to stripes, their tongues to knives, their mouths to gags, and their whole bodies to the fire,” rather than deny the truth expressed in this confession.

Along with The Heidelberg Catechism and the Canons of Dort, The Belgic Confession comprise what is collectively referred to as the Thee Forms of Unity. Article #15 of the Belgic Confession is as follows.

We believe that by the disobedience of Adam original sin has been spread through the whole human race.30 It is a corruption of the whole human nature—an inherited depravity which even infects small infants in their mother’s womb, and the root which produces in humanity every sort of sin. It is therefore so vile and enormous in God’s sight that it is enough to condemn the human race, and it is not abolished or wholly uprooted even by baptism, seeing that sin constantly boils forth as though from a contaminated spring. Nevertheless, it is not imputed to God’s children for their condemnation but is forgiven by his grace and mercy—not to put them to sleep but so that the awareness of this corruption might often make believers groan as they long to be set free from the body of this death.31 Therefore we reject the error of the Pelagians

who say that this sin is nothing else than a matter of imitation. 

30Rom. 5:12-13
31Rom. 7:24

Soli deo Gloria!

Holiness: Isaiah’s Vision of the LORD.

When addressing the subject of holiness in general, and the holiness of God in particular, arguably the definitive biblical text to consider and study is Isaiah 6:1-7. Our study of this classic chapter will begin in earnest this upcoming week. Today, I leave you to meditate upon not only the text, but also several comments from various pastors and theologians about the text.

“In the year that King Uzziah died I saw the Lord sitting upon a throne, high and lifted up; and the train of his robe filled the temple. Above him stood the seraphim. Each had six wings: with two he covered his face, and with two he covered his feet, and with two he flew. And one called to another and said: “Holy, holy, holy is the Lord of hosts; the whole earth is full of his glory!” And the foundations of the thresholds shook at the voice of him who called, and the house was filled with smoke. And I said: “Woe is me! For I am lost; for I am a man of unclean lips, and I dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips; for my eyes have seen the King, the Lord of hosts!” Then one of the seraphim flew to me, having in his hand a burning coal that he had taken with tongs from the altar. And he touched my mouth and said: “Behold, this has touched your lips; your guilt is taken away, and your sin atoned for.” Isaiah 6:1-7.

“God’s holiness. Exodus 15:2. ‘Glorious in holiness.’ Holiness is the most sparkling jewel of his crown; it is the name by which God is known. Psalm 111:9. ‘Holy and reverend is his name.’ He is ‘the holy One.’ Job 6:10. Seraphims cry, ‘Holy, holy, holy is the Lord of hosts, the whole earth is full of his glory.’ Isaiah 6:3. His power makes him mighty, his holiness makes him glorious. God’s holiness consists in his perfect love of righteousness, and abhorrence of evil, and cannot look on iniquity.’ Habakkuk I 13.” Puritan Thomas Watson

“He, the Prophet Isaiah, was so completely overpowered by this extraordinary vision as to forget that he was a prophet. For there was no feeling in him which was not overpowered by the presence of God, so that, like one who had lost his senses, he willingly plunged himself in darkness, or rather, like one who despaired of life, he of his own accord chose to die. And it is necessary that the godly should be affected in this manner, when the Lord gives them tokens of His presence, that they may be brought low and utterly confounded. Besides, in the person of His servant, God intended to strike His rebellious people with alarm; and therefore we need not wonder if He offers an apology for Himself under the overwhelming influence of fear, and like because he had not felt the weight of his office, as he now felt it, after having beheld an illustrious display of the majesty of God.” John Calvin

“Until we have seen ourselves as God sees us, we are not likely to be much disturbed over the conditions around us as long as they do not get so far out of hand as to threaten our comfortable way of life. We have learned to live with unholiness and have come to look upon it as the natural and expected thing. We are not disappointed that we do not find all truth in our teachers of faith, fullness in our politicians or complete honesty in our merchants or full trustworthiness in our friends. That we may continue to exist we make such laws as are necessary to protect us from our fellow men and let it go at that. Neither this writer, nor the reader of these words, is qualified to appreciate the holiness of God. God’s holiness is not simply the best we know infinitely bettered. We know nothing like the divine holiness. It stands apart, unique, unapproachable, incomprehensible and unattainable. The natural man is blind to it. He may fear God’s power and admire His wisdom, but His holiness he cannot even imagine.” A. W. Tozer

We will attempt to better understand the holiness of God as we consider Isaiah 6:1-7. May the Holy Spirit bring to each of us a grasp of the unique, unapproachable, incomprehensible and unattainable holiness of God. May each of us be changed because of our encounter with the biblical text as Isaiah was in his encounter with the biblical LORD.

Soli deo Gloria!

 

The Trauma of Holiness. A Theologian’s Perspective.

It should come as no surprise that one of my heroes is Dr. R. C. Sproul. Ligonier Ministries, which he founded in the early 1970’s, has ministered to me, and countless others, for well over 40 years. It continues to do so even with Dr. Sproul’s homecoming to heaven in 2017.

One of the classic works by Dr. Sproul was his book The Holiness of God. Today, I submit an excerpt of Dr. Sproul’s thoughts on the trauma God’s holiness causes to sinful people.

“Dr. Sigmund Freud argued that religion emerged as humans personalized nature and made it something they could negotiate with. Human beings invented the idea that natural disasters were inhabited by personal spirits: a storm god, an earthquake god, a fire god, and gods related to various sicknesses. These gods wielded natural forces to cause disaster. Having personalized these dangers, human beings could apply the techniques that we use to negotiate with personal hostile forces to the impersonal forces of nature. We could, for example, plead with the storm god, pray to the storm god, make sacrifices to the storm god, repent before the storm god in order to remove the threat. Eventually, human beings consolidated all the gods into one single deity who was in control over all these forces of nature and then pleaded with him.”  

“Yet there’s a difference between possibility and actuality. That what Freud said is possible doesn’t mean that it actually happened that way. The major hole in his theory is this: If Freud’s theory is true, why, then, was the God of the Bible “invented”? This holy God, we see in Scripture, inspires far greater trauma in those whom He encounters than any natural disaster. We see, for example, how even righteous Isaiah was completely undone by meeting the God of Israel face-to-face (Isa. 6:1–7). Well-meaning Uzzah was struck dead when trying to steady the ark of this holy God (2 Sam. 6:5–10). Peter, James, and John at first saw the revelation of Christ’s deity and their hearing of the Father’s voice not as a blessing but as a terror (Matt. 17:1–8).”

Dr. Sproul continues by saying, “Why, to redeem us from the threat of trauma, would we invent a God whose character is infinitely more threatening than anything else we fear? I can see humanity inventing a benevolent god or even a bad god who is easily appeased. But would we invent a holy God? Where does that come from? For there is nothing in the universe more terrifying, more threatening to a person’s sense of security and well-being than the holiness of God. What we see throughout the Scriptures is that God rules over all of the threatening forces that we fear. But this same God, in and of Himself, frightens us more than any of these other things. We understand that nothing poses a greater threat to our well-being than the holiness of God. Left to ourselves, none of us would invent the God of the Bible, the being who is a threat to our sense of security more primal and more fundamental than any act of nature.”

Do take notice of two of Dr. Sproul’s sentences from the previous paragraph. “We understand that nothing poses a greater threat to our well-being than the holiness of God. Left to ourselves, none of us would invent the God of the Bible, the being who is a threat to our sense of security more primal and more fundamental than any act of nature.”

Dr. Sproul concludes by saying, “Martin Luther and the other Reformers understood the holy character of this God. For them, the recovery of the gospel was such good news because they knew the trauma of holiness and that the only way to endure the presence of this holy God’s judgment is to be covered in the holiness and righteousness of Christ. Five hundred years after the Protestant Reformation, the church desperately needs men and women who understand the trauma of God’s holiness, for in understanding that holiness we see that the gospel is the only thing that can give us confidence that when we meet this God face-to-face, His holiness will embrace us and not cast us into eternal judgment. May God in His grace grant to all of us a renewed vision of His majestic holiness.”

What a wonderful supporting evidence for the veracity of the Scriptures and the God of the same.  When next we meet, we will examine the foremost text concerning the trauma of holiness. It is the Prophet Isaiah’s encounter with God as recorded in Isaiah 6:1-7.

Soli deo Gloria!

 

 

 

 

Holiness: New Testament Examples of the Trauma of Holiness. Part Two.

“Why, to redeem us from the threat of trauma, would we invent a God whose character is infinitely more threatening than anything else we fear? I can see humanity inventing a benevolent god or even a bad god who is easily appeased. But would we invent a holy God? Where does that come from? For there is nothing in the universe more terrifying, more threatening to a person’s sense of security and well-being than the holiness of God.” Dr. R. C. Sproul

As we continue our study of holiness, and in this particular instance the trauma holiness causes believers and unbelievers alike, let’s examine one of strangest miracles Jesus ever performed. The account is found in all three Synoptic Gospels (Matthew 8:28-9:1; Mark 5:1-21; Luke 8:26-39).The particular incident involves the people of the Gerasenes, which was approximately 10 km southeast of the Sea of Galilee. Luke’s narrative of the miracle, which occurs immediately after Luke’s account of Jesus calming the storm, is as follows.

26 Then they sailed to the country of the Gerasenes, which is opposite Galilee. 27 When Jesus had stepped out on land, there met him a man from the city who had demons. For a long time he had worn no clothes, and he had not lived in a house but among the tombs. 28 When he saw Jesus, he cried out and fell down before him and said with a loud voice, “What have you to do with me, Jesus, Son of the Most High God? I beg you, do not torment me.” 29 For he had commanded the unclean spirit to come out of the man. (For many a time it had seized him. He was kept under guard and bound with chains and shackles, but he would break the bonds and be driven by the demon into the desert.) 30 Jesus then asked him, “What is your name?” And he said, “Legion,” for many demons had entered him. 31 And they begged him not to command them to depart into the abyss. 32 Now a large herd of pigs was feeding there on the hillside, and they begged him to let them enter these. So he gave them permission. 33 Then the demons came out of the man and entered the pigs, and the herd rushed down the steep bank into the lake and drowned.

34 When the herdsmen saw what had happened, they fled and told it in the city and in the country. 35 Then people went out to see what had happened, and they came to Jesus and found the man from whom the demons had gone, sitting at the feet of Jesus, clothed and in his right mind, and they were afraid. 36 And those who had seen it told them how the demon-possessed man had been healed. 37 Then all the people of the surrounding country of the Gerasenes asked him to depart from them, for they were seized with great fear. So he got into the boat and returned. 38 The man from whom the demons had gone begged that he might be with him, but Jesus sent him away, saying, 39 “Return to your home, and declare how much God has done for you.” And he went away, proclaiming throughout the whole city how much Jesus had done for him.”

We’re not sure as the the exact location of this story. What we do know is that soon after Jesus stepped on land a demon possessed man met Him. The text says that he wore no clothes and lived among the tombs of the dead. The significance of the man being naked is that he lived as an animal and not as a rational human being.

While the man spoke to Jesus, it more than likely were the demons who possessed the man who said, “What have you to do with me, Jesus, Son of the Most High God? I beg you, do not torment me.” Luke adds a parenthetical statement which says, “For he had commanded the unclean spirit to come out of the man. (For many a time it had seized him. He was kept under guard and bound with chains and shackles, but he would break the bonds and be driven by the demon into the desert.)” 

When Jesus asked the demon his name he replied “Legion” because the man was possessed by many demons. A legion could be anywhere from 3,000 up to 6,000 soldiers in the ancient Roman Army.

The text then says, “And they begged him not to command them to depart into the abyss. 32 Now a large herd of pigs was feeding there on the hillside, and they begged him to let them enter these. So he gave them permission. 33 Then the demons came out of the man and entered the pigs, and the herd rushed down the steep bank into the lake and drowned.

The “abyss” is the underworld, the prison of bound demons. The abyss is also mentioned in 2 Pet. 2:4 and Jude 6). The demons knew that Jesus had the power and authority to send them there if He wished.

Luke then states that, “34 When the herdsmen saw what had happened, they fled and told it in the city and in the country. 35 Then people went out to see what had happened, and they came to Jesus and found the man from whom the demons had gone, sitting at the feet of Jesus, clothed and in his right mind, and they were afraid. 36 And those who had seen it told them how the demon-possessed man had been healed. 37 Then all the people of the surrounding country of the Gerasenes asked him to depart from them, for they were seized with great fear. So he got into the boat and returned.

Notice that the man is now clothed and in his right mind. He is no longer behaving like an animal. However, the reaction from the people who came upon this now tranquil scene is fear. The main take away from this text, in light of the subject of the trauma of holiness, is that Luke states two times that the people of the surrounding country of the Gerasenes were afraid of Jesus and were seized with great fear (vs. 35; 37). They were so filled with fear that they asked Jesus to depart from them. This is reminiscent of Simon Peter’s request for Jesus to depart from him because Peter was a sinful man (Luke 5). While it is assumed the demon possessed man would have frightened the people by his behavior, Jesus frightened them even more not only because of what He did, but also because of who He was.

However, the formerly demon possessed man was not afraid. 38 “The man from whom the demons had gone begged that he might be with him, but Jesus sent him away, saying, 39 “Return to your home, and declare how much God has done for you.” And he went away, proclaiming throughout the whole city how much Jesus had done for him.” The man acknowledges that Jesus is God. 

A healthy fear of the holiness of God serves the people of God, and others, in good stead. For the believer, such fear provides a needed humility and homage to the LORD. For the unbeliever, it serves to bring them to their knees in repentance before the LORD.

Soli deo Gloria!  

 

 

Holiness: New Testament Examples of the Trauma of Holiness.

We begin today with an introductory monologue by Dr. Michael Horton which was recently aired on the radio program The White Horse Inn. I would encourage to pay particular attention to the third paragraph. In his message on the subject of justification by grace alone, through faith alone, in the person and work of Jesus Christ alone, Dr. Horton states,

We’re a very “how to” society. That has served us very well in all kinds of ways. It’s helped us during the pioneering days. Even today we have people who are always thinking about the next big thing. The next thing to do out there. And this is what we were created for. We were created for a purpose. We’re created for a plan. The chief end of man is to glorify God and to enjoy Him forever. But the “fall” happened and we heard a surprising announcement. An announcement we’re not wired for. An announcement that surprises us and shocks us. And because of the “fall” we’re naturally turned into ourselves so we don’t naturally hear that message. We don’t naturally believe that message. We are turned in on ourselves, and it’s very hard for us to look outside of ourselves. To look up in faith toward God and to look out in love toward our neighbor. What we need is not more good advice but good news.

“This is what we see in Genesis 15. Abram is definitely turned in on himself and he’s expecting God to help him fulfill his life purpose, or to make God the supporting actor in his (Abram’s) life’s story. He (Abram) has all of his plans, all of his purposes and he wants God to be a kind of genie to make it all happen for him. To help him (Abram) rule his own life. But God makes him (Abram) a supporting character in His story.”

“God begins by saying “fear not.” Isn’t it interesting the first time God appears to people, and many times thereafter, their first response is fear. Always be suspicious of people who say they have had an encounter with God and they were just yacking it up with Him. In the Bible, when people have an encounter with the LORD, they say “woe to me for I am undone” or “depart from me for I am a sinful man.” Fear is the first response. What does the angel say to Mary when he first appears to her: “fear not Mary.” Jesus says in Luke 12:32, “Fear not, little flock, for it is your Father’s good pleasure to give you the kingdom.”

The first indication that an individual has encountered the holy God of the Bible is reverential and debilitating fear and trembling. As we have previously seen, this was true in the Old Testament. It was also true for those who encountered the LORD in the New Testament. While several examples good be cited as evidence, the following excerpts are submitted.

First, the angelic announcement to Mary (Luke 1:26-37) and the angel’s statement, upon seeing her troubled countenance, to not be afraid (1:29-30). A similar statement is made as the shepherds were abiding in the fields, keeping watch over their flock by night announcing the birth of the Christ in Bethlehem (Luke 2:8-14).

The text says, And an angel of the Lord appeared to them, and the glory of the Lord shone around them, and they were filled with great fear. 10 And the angel said to them, “Fear not, for behold, I bring you good news of great joy that will be for all the people.”

As was the case with Mary, the shepherds’ reaction upon encountering the angel’s reflected holiness and glory of God was to be in great fear. The angel’s response was to tell them to “fear not.”

Second, there was the Apostle Peter’s reaction to the presence and work of Jesus at the miracle of the great catch of fish (Luke 5:1-11). Luke 5:1-7 gives us the narrative concerning the miracle.

“On one occasion, while the crowd was pressing in on him to hear the word of God, he was standing by the lake of Gennesaret, and he saw two boats by the lake, but the fishermen had gone out of them and were washing their nets. Getting into one of the boats, which was Simon’s, he asked him to put out a little from the land. And he sat down and taught the people from the boat. And when he had finished speaking, he said to Simon, “Put out into the deep and let down your nets for a catch.” And Simon answered, “Master, we toiled all night and took nothing! But at your word I will let down the nets.” And when they had done this, they enclosed a large number of fish, and their nets were breaking. They signaled to their partners in the other boat to come and help them. And they came and filled both the boats, so that they began to sink.”  

While the account of the catch of fish is a familiar one, Peter’s response may not be. Luke 5:8 says, “But when Simon Peter saw it, he fell down at Jesus’ knees, saying, “Depart from me, for I am a sinful man, O Lord.”

In the strongest possible terms, Peter prostrates and falls down at Jesus knees and commands the Lord to leave him and go away. Why? It is due to the fact that Peter realizes not only who Jesus is, but also what he himself is: a sinner given to sinful behavior. What is Jesus’ response to Simon? “Do not be afraid; from now on you will be catching men.” Once again, the reaction by the unholy upon encountering the holy is fear.

We may summarize the trauma of holiness thus far as an evidence for the truth of the Scripture concerning the person and nature of God. The God of the Bible is not the type of god sinful mankind would, or could, invent. He is the exact opposite of what sinners want, but He is exactly what sinners need.

 

Soli deo Gloria!

 

 

 

 

Holiness: Old Testament Examples of the Trauma of Holiness.

“That dread and amazement with which as Scripture uniformly relates, holy men were struck and overwhelmed whenever they beheld the presence of God. When we see those who previously stood firm and secure so quaking with terror, that the fear of death takes hold of them, nay, they are, in a manner, swallowed up and annihilated, the inference to be drawn is that men are never duly touched and impressed with a conviction of their insignificance, until they have contrasted themselves with the majesty of God.” John Calvin

I have heard people say that they would love to see the LORD. I have heard people sing, and I have sung, words extolling the LORD being high and lifted up and wanting to see Him in the light of His glory. What was the effect upon people in the Scriptures who did witness and encounter the holiness of God? What was their reaction?

Believers may often respond with the exclamation of “wow” following a particularly moving worship service. I wonder how many of us react with the exclamation of “woe?” Are we duly touched and impressed with a conviction of our own insignificance when we encounter, however briefly, the majesty and holy magnificence of God? Let’s look at some Old Testament characters who were.

Let’s begin with Abraham. The father of the faithful. Abraham is known in the Scriptures as the “friend of God” (James 2:23). What was Abraham’s perspective and reaction when realizing he was in the presence of the LORD in Genesis 18:1-33?

First, when the LORD appeared to Abraham by the oaks of Mamre he ran to meet the LORD and the two other visitors with Him and bowed himself to the earth (Genesis 18:2). One commentary explains that, “When the visitor is an ordinary person, the host merely rises; but if of superior rank, the custom is to advance a little towards the stranger, and after a very low bow, turn and lead him to the tent, putting an arm round his waist, or tapping him on the shoulder as they go, to assure him of welcome.”

Following a time of refreshment from Abraham and Sarah to the three visitors, the LORD reveals to Abraham His intentions of judging Sodom and Gomorrah (Genesis 18:16-21). What follows is Abraham’s negotiations with the LORD as to the extent of His judgment. Throughout this exchange, Abraham acknowledges that he is only “dust and ashes” and possesses a posture of submission and deference to the LORD. Abraham did not view the LORD as a buddy, in which he could address Him as an equal.

Dr. John Walvoord explains that, “Abraham … hurried to them (18:2), hurried back to the tent (v. 6), ran to the herd (v. 7), and his servant hurried (v. 7); Abraham bowed low before them (v. 2); he had water brought to wash their feet (v. 4); he served them freshly baked bread (v. 6), a choice … calf (v. 7), curds and milk (v. 8), and he stood while they were eating (v. 8; cf. vv. 1–2). All this suggests that he perceived who his visitors were.”

What about the Patriarch Job? What was his response when he finally received the audience before God that he so earnestly requested in light of his extreme sufferings? In Job 42:1-6 we receive the answer.

“Then Job answered the Lord and said: “I know that you can do all things, and that no purpose of yours can be thwarted. ‘Who is this that hides counsel without knowledge?’ Therefore I have uttered what I did not understand, things too wonderful for me, which I did not know. ‘Hear, and I will speak; I will question you, and you make it known to me.’ I had heard of you by the hearing of the ear, but now my eye sees you; therefore I despise myself, and repent in dust and ashes.”

 Job’s response, to being in the presence of the LORD and the LORD’s response to Job’s complaints (Job 38-41), was one of self-condemnation, an acknowledgment of his own ignorance of the ways of God, and a self-despising resulting in repentance. In short, Job repented of his pride.

Our third example are the people of Israel at Mt. Sinai in Exodus 19. Israel assembled at Mt Sinai for what would become an eleven month stay (Exodus 19:1-40:38; Numbers 10:1-11). It would be on the third day of their assembling that God would appear to the people. Exodus 19:16-20 records what occurred.

16 “On the morning of the third day there were thunders and lightnings and a thick cloud on the mountain and a very loud trumpet blast, so that all the people in the camp trembled. 17 Then Moses brought the people out of the camp to meet God, and they took their stand at the foot of the mountain. 18 Now Mount Sinai was wrapped in smoke because the Lord had descended on it in fire. The smoke of it went up like the smoke of a kiln, and the whole mountain trembled greatly. 19 And as the sound of the trumpet grew louder and louder, Moses spoke, and God answered him in thunder. 20 The Lord came down on Mount Sinai, to the top of the mountain. And the Lord called Moses to the top of the mountain, and Moses went up.”

 There is a brief statement in vs. 16 regarding the reaction by the people to the presence of God: “all the people in the camp trembled.” The word “trembled” means to be actively and continually, physically and emotionally, terrified.

From but three examples found in the Old Testament, we see that people were physically, emotionally and spiritually brought low when they encountered the holy LORD God. Was this the same type of reaction for those we find in the New Testament who encountered the LORD’s holiness? When next we meet, we will discover the answer.

What about you? Do you have a sense of your own unworthiness when entering into the LORD’s presence: whether in corporate or private worship? May we approach the LORD today with the fresh eyes of understanding of how to correctly come before the presence of the holy One. Remember, “that men are never duly touched and impressed with a conviction of their insignificance, until they have contrasted themselves with the majesty of God.”

Soli deo Gloria!

 

Holiness: The Trauma of Holiness.

“Man is never sufficiently touched and affected by the awareness of his lowly state until he has compared himself with God’s majesty.”  John Calvin

Have you ever been traumatized? What in fact does it mean to be traumatized? What exactly is trauma and how does it relate to the subject of holiness?

Trauma is defined as a deeply distressing or disturbing experience. Many people, including my family, have experienced the personal trauma of the death of a child, or children.

For those serving in the military, the experience of combat, and injury from combat, is a deeply distressing and disturbing experience. Not only for the veteran but also for his/her family.

Recently at work, one of my co-workers came into the warehouse office complaining of chest pains. Our supervisor immediately called 911, an ambulance was dispatched and my friend was taken to the hospital. Seeing him waiting for the ambulance, I saw the face of a 57 year old man who was experiencing physical and emotional trauma.

I believe it is safe to say that all of us have experienced some kind of personal trauma at some point in our lives. Perhaps as a child, adolescent, teenager, young adult or even as a mature adult. Trauma knows no boundaries and sets no age limits. Anyone who has watched infomercials about Shriner’s Hospital for Children or St. Jude’s Children’s Hospital can see how these two particular institutions help families cope with the trauma of childhood diseases and birth defects.

People do not just experience physical trauma. There is also psychological trauma, which is damage to the mind that occurs as a result of a distressing event. Trauma is often the result of an overwhelming amount of stress that exceeds one’s ability to cope, or integrate the emotions involved with that experience.

There are three types of trauma: acute, chronic, or complex. Acute trauma results from a single incident.  Chronic trauma is repeated and prolonged such as domestic violence or abuse. Complex trauma is exposure to varied and multiple traumatic events, often of an invasive, interpersonal nature.

You may be wondering what trauma has to do with the subject of holiness. Plenty! Those individuals, or people groups, who the Bible states personally encountered the holiness of God experienced psychological, emotional and even physical trauma.

Dr. R. C. Sproul explains that, “Nearly five hundred years ago, the task of systematizing the biblical doctrines recovered during the Protestant Reformation fell to John Calvin. His Institutes of the Christian Religion remains one of the most important and influential theological works ever produced. Calvin devoted his life to Bible study, refining and expanding the Institutes before his death. Near the beginning of this work, Calvin succinctly encapsulated what the encounters between God and man in Scripture tell us about human nature. He writes, “man is never sufficiently touched and affected by the awareness of his lowly state until he has compared himself with God’s majesty” (1.1.3).

A common expression in the Old Testament was “We shall die, for we have seen God” (Judges 13:22). Dr. John MacArthur writes that, This reaction of the fear of death is familiar with those who come into God’s presence. Many did die when facing God, as the OT records. It is the terror in the heart of the sinner when in the presence of a holy God. Cf. Ezekiel (Ezek. 1:28), Isaiah (Isa. 6:5), the 12 (Mark 4:35–41), Peter (Luke 5:8), and John (Rev. 1:17–18).

For the next several days we will briefly examine the situations which brought people in the Scriptures to an awareness of the holiness of God and their inevitable reaction to not only who God was, but also who they were. It would wise for believers today to also gain this perspective.

Soli deo Gloria!

 

 

The Belgic Confession: LORD’S DAY 13, 2020.

On each Lord’s Day this year, we will reproduce devotional articles taken from The Belgic Confession. The Belgic Confession, written in 1561, owes its origin to the need for a clear and comprehensive statement of Reformed Theology during the time of the Spanish inquisition in the Lowlands. Guido de Brès, its primary author, was pleading for understanding and toleration from King Philip II of Spain who was determined to root out all Protestant factions in his jurisdiction. Hence, this confession takes pains to point out the continuity of Reformed Theology with that of the ancient Christian creeds.

The oldest of the doctrinal standards of the Christian Reformed Church and the Reformed Church in America is the Confession of Faith, popularly known as the Belgic Confession, following the seventeenth-century Latin designation “Confessio Belgica.” “Belgica” referred to the whole of the Netherlands, both north and south, which today is divided into the Netherlands and Belgium. The confession’s chief author was Guido de Brès, a preacher of the Reformed churches of the Netherlands, who died a martyr to the faith in the year 1567.

During the sixteenth century the churches in this country were exposed to terrible persecution by the Roman Catholic government. To protest against this cruel oppression, and to prove to the persecutors that the adherents of the Reformed faith were not rebels, as was laid to their charge, but law-abiding citizens who professed the true Christian doctrine according to the Holy Scriptures, de Brès prepared this confession in the year 1561. In the following year a copy was sent to King Philip II, together with an address in which the petitioners declared that they were ready to obey the government in all lawful things, but that they would “offer their backs to stripes, their tongues to knives, their mouths to gags, and their whole bodies to the fire,” rather than deny the truth expressed in this confession.

Along with The Heidelberg Catechism and the Canons of Dort, The Belgic Confession comprise what is collectively referred to as the Thee Forms of Unity. Article #14 of the Belgic Confession is as follows.

Article 14: The Creation and Fall of Humanity.

We believe that God created human beings from the dust of the earth and made and formed them in his image and likeness—good, just, and holy; able by their will to conform in all things to the will of God. But when they were in honor they did not understand it21 and did not recognize their excellence. But they subjected themselves willingly to sin and consequently to death and the curse, lending their ear to the word of the devil. For they transgressed the commandment of life, which they had received, and by their sin they separated themselves from God, who was their true life, having corrupted their entire nature. So they made themselves guilty and subject to physical and spiritual death, having become wicked, perverse, and corrupt in all their ways.

They lost all their excellent gifts which they had received from God, and retained none of them except for small traces which are enough to make them inexcusable.

Moreover, all the light in us is turned to darkness, as the Scripture teaches us: “The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not overcome it.”22 Here John calls the human race “darkness.” Therefore we reject everything taught to the contrary concerning human free will, since humans are nothing but the slaves of sin and cannot do a thing unless it is given them from heaven.23 For who can boast of being able to do anything good by oneself, since Christ says, “No one can come to me unless drawn by the Father who sent me”?24

Who can glory in their own will when they understand that “the mind that is set on the flesh is hostile to God”?25 Who can speak of their own knowledge in view of the fact that “those who are unspiritual do not receive the gifts of God’s Spirit”?26 In short, who can produce a single thought, knowing that we are not able to think a thing about ourselves,
by ourselves, but that “our competence is from God”?27

And therefore, what the apostle says ought rightly to stand fixed and firm: God works within us both to will and to do according to his good pleasure.28 For there is no understanding nor will conforming to God’s understanding and will apart from Christ’s involvement, as he teaches us when he says, “Apart from me you can do nothing.”29

21Ps. 49:20
22John 1:5
23John 3:27
24John 6:44
25Rom. 8:7
261 Cor. 2:14
272 Cor. 3:5
28Phil. 2:13
29John 15:5

Soli deo Gloria!

 

 

Holiness: Miscellaneous Thoughts about Holiness.

It is amazing how the subject of holiness has dominated my thinking of late. More amazing still is how many times, since I began earnestly studying this biblical doctrine that I have come across comments and quotes concerning holiness. Today’s blog is a miscellaneous selection of quotes regarding this important and essential doctrine in the believer’s life.

1 Thessalonians 2:11–12 says, 11 For you know how, like a father with his children, 12 we exhorted each one of you and encouraged you and charged you to walk in a manner worthy of God, who calls you into his own kingdom and glory.”

 In commenting on this text one pastor writes, “The Christian ethic is inseparable from the Christian gospel. Lose one, and the other will disappear as well. Paul indicates that living the Christian ethic is “worthy of God” (1 Thess. 2:12). Essentially, the Apostle means that believers must live in such a way that it can rightly be said of them that they belong to God. In other words, our conduct must reflect the character of God Himself. If it does not and we remain impenitent, we show ourselves unworthy of the kingdom. The sense here is not that we merit our kingdom citizenship by our holiness but that kingdom citizenship inevitably and always manifests itself by our holy living. Paul says that we are to “walk” in such a way, using the present tense (v. 12). We should be consistently pursuing righteousness, slowly but steadily increasing in godliness.

Another Bible teacher explains that, “Our love and holiness are not the basis of our salvation. Only the perfection of Christ can make us stand before God unafraid. Yet, neither will we be saved without growing in love and holiness, for sanctification—growth in grace—is the inevitable fruit of our justification—being declared righteous in Christ. Those who have been saved will certainly pursue love and holiness. Let us strive to do so today.”

Dr. Sinclair Ferguson, at the 2019-2020 Reformed Bible College Convocation, preached a message entitled Fidelity, Sanctity and Orthodoxy. Regarding the subject of sanctity, or holiness, he stated that, “God has called us to a holy calling, or a calling to be holy. One of the great forgotten words of the modern Christian church is the holiness of God and the holiness of his people. The Apostle Paul builds up all that Christ has done for us in order to create this sanctity, this holiness in us. God set His heart upon it before the dawn of time. He sent His Son to accomplish it by His death and resurrection, His ascension and His heavenly reign. What is the goal of this? The goal of this is that He might transform us and make us holy. Holiness is not an optional addition to our calling. Holiness is our calling. Holiness is the only thing that will last for all eternity in the presence of God. It is being like Jesus.”

May each of us resolve to pursue holiness at all costs. This is because holiness is not an optional addition to our calling. Holiness is our calling.

Soli deo Gloria!