The Gospel of Matthew: I Find No Fault in Him.

11 Now Jesus stood before the governor, and the governor asked him, “Are you the King of the Jews?” Jesus said, “You have said so.” 12 But when he was accused by the chief priests and elders, he gave no answer. 13 Then Pilate said to him, “Do you not hear how many things they testify against you?” 14 But he gave him no answer, not even to a single charge, so that the governor was greatly amazed.” Matthew 27:11–14 (ESV)

“And as soon as it was morning, the chief priests held a consultation with the elders and scribes and the whole council. And they bound Jesus and led him away and delivered him over to Pilate. And Pilate asked him, “Are you the King of the Jews?” And he answered him, “You have said so.” And the chief priests accused him of many things. And Pilate again asked him, “Have you no answer to make? See how many charges they bring against you.” But Jesus made no further answer, so that Pilate was amazed.” (Mark 15:1–5 (ESV)

Then the whole company of them arose and brought him before Pilate. And they began to accuse him, saying, “We found this man misleading our nation and forbidding us to give tribute to Caesar, and saying that he himself is Christ, a king.” And Pilate asked him, “Are you the King of the Jews?” And he answered him, “You have said so.” Then Pilate said to the chief priests and the crowds, “I find no guilt in this man.” But they were urgent, saying, “He stirs up the people, teaching throughout all Judea, from Galilee even to this place.” (Luke 23:1–5 (ESV)

28 Then they led Jesus from the house of Caiaphas to the governor’s headquarters. It was early morning. They themselves did not enter the governor’s headquarters, so that they would not be defiled, but could eat the Passover. 29 So Pilate went outside to them and said, “What accusation do you bring against this man?” 30 They answered him, “If this man were not doing evil, we would not have delivered him over to you.” 31 Pilate said to them, “Take him yourselves and judge him by your own law.” The Jews said to him, “It is not lawful for us to put anyone to death.” 32 This was to fulfill the word that Jesus had spoken to show by what kind of death he was going to die.” (John 18:28–32 (ESV)

Upon hearing Jesus’ answer “You have said so.” to his initial question ““Are you the King of the Jews,” Pontius Pilate said, ““Do you not hear how many things they testify against you?” (Matt. 27:13), and “Have you no answer to make? See how many charges they bring against you,” (Mark 15:4). However, Jesus remained silent. His silence fulfilled Isaiah 53:7.

Luke alone recorded the Sanhedrin’s specific charges against the Lord. They were, “We found this man misleading our nation and forbidding us to give tribute to Caesar, and saying that he himself is Christ, a king.” All three were misleading statements and intended to prejudice Pilate against Jesus.

Matthew and Mark wrote Pilate was amazed Jesus did not respond to a single charge. To be amazed (θαυμάζω; thaumazo) means to be astonished and to wonder. Whether this reaction was favorable or unfavorable depends on the context. In this context, it was favorable because Pilate said the Jews, ““I find no guilt in this man.”

“Jesus need not answer those charges, for He was not being tried for those accusations. Instead He was on trial because they said He claimed to be the King of the Jews, the Messiah (Matt. 26:63–64). Since Pilate had also declared Jesus’ innocence (John 18:38), there was no reason for Him to answer the accusations,” explains Dr. William Hendriksen.

The Jews responded, ““He stirs up the people, teaching throughout all Judea, from Galilee even to this place.” The chief priests and the crowds said Jesus was causing the people to riot. This was a lie, but it did not matter to them. They wanted Jesus executed and were going to do, or say, whatever they could to accomplish this goal. The only one stopping this from happening in their minds was Pontius Pilate.

Pilate initially proved to be a man of integrity. He realized Jesus was not guilty of any crime, let alone a capital offense. He did not give in to the Jews demands for Jesus’ execution. However, Pilate was also the consummate politician. He ultimately would chose the expedient course of action instead of doing what was right. “To preserve the peace he will put the innocent to death (Matt. 27:26), becoming an infamous character in world history,” states Dr. R. C. Sproul.

“God is a God of justice (Deut. 10:18) and is angered any time justice is not done. We likewise must be moved to work for justice, and being reminded that Rome did not deal with Jesus righteously should make us hate injustice all the more. We should be doing all we can to make sure justice is done, and some ways we can do so in our communities is by voting for honest judges and politicians and supporting ministries that work to extend justice to the unborn,” concludes Dr. Sproul.

Soli deo Gloria!

The Gospel of Matthew: Are You the King of the Jews?      

11 Now Jesus stood before the governor, and the governor asked him, “Are you the King of the Jews?” Jesus said, “You have said so.” 12 But when he was accused by the chief priests and elders, he gave no answer. 13 Then Pilate said to him, “Do you not hear how many things they testify against you?” 14 But he gave him no answer, not even to a single charge, so that the governor was greatly amazed.” Matthew 27:11–14 (ESV)

“And as soon as it was morning, the chief priests held a consultation with the elders and scribes and the whole council. And they bound Jesus and led him away and delivered him over to Pilate. And Pilate asked him, “Are you the King of the Jews?” And he answered him, “You have said so.” And the chief priests accused him of many things. And Pilate again asked him, “Have you no answer to make? See how many charges they bring against you.” But Jesus made no further answer, so that Pilate was amazed.” (Mark 15:1–5 (ESV)

Then the whole company of them arose and brought him before Pilate. And they began to accuse him, saying, “We found this man misleading our nation and forbidding us to give tribute to Caesar, and saying that he himself is Christ, a king.” And Pilate asked him, “Are you the King of the Jews?” And he answered him, “You have said so.” Then Pilate said to the chief priests and the crowds, “I find no guilt in this man.” But they were urgent, saying, “He stirs up the people, teaching throughout all Judea, from Galilee even to this place.” (Luke 23:1–5 (ESV)

28 Then they led Jesus from the house of Caiaphas to the governor’s headquarters. It was early morning. They themselves did not enter the governor’s headquarters, so that they would not be defiled, but could eat the Passover. 29 So Pilate went outside to them and said, “What accusation do you bring against this man?” 30 They answered him, “If this man were not doing evil, we would not have delivered him over to you.” 31 Pilate said to them, “Take him yourselves and judge him by your own law.” The Jews said to him, “It is not lawful for us to put anyone to death.” 32 This was to fulfill the word that Jesus had spoken to show by what kind of death he was going to die.” (John 18:28–32 (ESV)

It was this statement regarding Jesus’ kingship which caught Pilate’s attention. Matthew, Mark and Luke recorded Pilate asked Jesus, “Are you the King of the Jews?” The Lord’s response sparked an interesting interchange between the two individuals.

Matthew recorded “Jesus stood before the governor.” The Greek grammar reveals Jesus was placed before Pilate to stand trial; not unlike the apostles before the Sanhedrin (Acts 5:27). In other words, Jesus was facing a judge and jury in Pilate. Ironically, Pilate was also facing his eternal judge. Jesus knew who Pilate was. However, Pilate had no clue the identity of Jesus.

Pilate asked Jesus a direct question: “Are you the King of the Jews?” The Greek grammar indicates Pilate continually asked this question. Perhaps because Jesus stood silently before him. He wanted Jesus to tell the truth whether He was presently and actively the one and only king possessing absolute authority over the Jewish people? Jesus continually responded with the statement, ““You have said so.”

“When Pilate now asked Jesus, “You are the king of the Jews?” he asked it because he felt that for his own protection—as already explained—he had to do this, and not because he himself believed the charge. How could he believe it? The situation was entirely too ridiculous, too unreal,” explains Dr. William Hendriksen.

 “As if Jews, grievously vexed by the yoke of the oppressor and yearning for the time when they would be able to shake it off and once again enjoy victories under their own kings, would be so very displeased with one of their own countrymen who supposedly was of one mind with them and was even willing to be their leader, that for this reason, out of love for Rome, they wanted him to be crucified! No, Pilate could not believe that. Besides, he already knew the real reason why they hated Jesus and had Him arraigned (Matt. 27:18).”

“Are You the King of the Jews? The answer came in the affirmative. But as John recorded, Jesus’ kingdom at that time was not a political kingdom to rival Rome (John 18:33–37),” states the Bible Knowledge Commentary.

Pontius Pilate did not understand Jesus was/is the King of kings who providentially appointed Pontius Pilate to his governorship (Romans 13:1). While Jesus faced His temporal human judge historically, Pilate faced his eternal, divine judge.

Soli deo Gloria!

The Gospel of Matthew: The Interrogation Begins.     

11 Now Jesus stood before the governor, and the governor asked him, “Are you the King of the Jews?” Jesus said, “You have said so.” 12 But when he was accused by the chief priests and elders, he gave no answer. 13 Then Pilate said to him, “Do you not hear how many things they testify against you?” 14 But he gave him no answer, not even to a single charge, so that the governor was greatly amazed.” Matthew 27:11–14 (ESV)

“And as soon as it was morning, the chief priests held a consultation with the elders and scribes and the whole council. And they bound Jesus and led him away and delivered him over to Pilate. And Pilate asked him, “Are you the King of the Jews?” And he answered him, “You have said so.” And the chief priests accused him of many things. And Pilate again asked him, “Have you no answer to make? See how many charges they bring against you.” But Jesus made no further answer, so that Pilate was amazed.” (Mark 15:1–5 (ESV)

Then the whole company of them arose and brought him before Pilate. And they began to accuse him, saying, “We found this man misleading our nation and forbidding us to give tribute to Caesar, and saying that he himself is Christ, a king.” And Pilate asked him, “Are you the King of the Jews?” And he answered him, “You have said so.” Then Pilate said to the chief priests and the crowds, “I find no guilt in this man.” But they were urgent, saying, “He stirs up the people, teaching throughout all Judea, from Galilee even to this place.” (Luke 23:1–5 (ESV)

28 Then they led Jesus from the house of Caiaphas to the governor’s headquarters. It was early morning. They themselves did not enter the governor’s headquarters, so that they would not be defiled, but could eat the Passover. 29 So Pilate went outside to them and said, “What accusation do you bring against this man?” 30 They answered him, “If this man were not doing evil, we would not have delivered him over to you.” 31 Pilate said to them, “Take him yourselves and judge him by your own law.” The Jews said to him, “It is not lawful for us to put anyone to death.” 32 This was to fulfill the word that Jesus had spoken to show by what kind of death he was going to die.” (John 18:28–32 (ESV)

In studying the Passion Week of the Lord Jesus Christ, it is wise to examine all four Gospel accounts. Each evangelist, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, contribute to our comprehensive understanding of our Lord’s arrest, trials, crucifixion, death and resurrection. Condemned to death by the Jewish religious authorities, Jesus subsequently faced three trials before the ruling secular authorities.

Beginning today, we examine the Son of God’s first trial before the Roman governor, Pontius Pilate.

Pontius Pilate asked the Jewish religious leaders what accusations they had against Jesus. The Jews responded, ““If this man were not doing evil, we would not have delivered him over to you.” (John 18:30).Pilate then said, ““Take him yourselves and judge him by your own law.” (John 18:31a). They replied, ““It is not lawful for us to put anyone to death.” (John 18:31b). John notes this was a fulfilment of Jesus’ words He would be crucified (Matt. 20:19; 26:2; Mark 10:33; Luke 18:32; John 12:32-33).

As previously noted, Luke’s Gospel alone specifically outlines the Sanhedrin’s criminal charges against the Lord Jesus Christ. “We found this man misleading our nation and forbidding us to give tribute to Caesar, and saying that he himself is Christ, a king.” (Luke 23:2). The fabricated accusations included (1) misleading the Jewish nation; (2) forbidding Jews to give tribute to Caesar; and (3) being an insurrectionist against Rome by saying He was a king.

It was this statement regarding Jesus’ kingship which caught Pilate’s attention. Matthew, Mark and Luke recorded Pilate asking Jesus, “Are you the King of the Jews?” The Lord’s response sparked an interesting debate between the two individuals.

“To understand why Pilate finally condemns Jesus to death, we need to know something of Pilate’s character and his relationship with Israel. From his appointment as governor of Judea (circa AD 26), Pontius Pilate has shown little but contempt for his Jewish subjects, raiding the temple treasury to finance the construction of an aqueduct and even murdering some Galileans while they offered sacrifices (Luke 13:1). As such, Pilate will not be moved to kill Jesus simply because Jesus violates the Sanhedrin’s religious sensibilities. In fact, Pilate’s hatred for the Sanhedrin is well-known,” explains Dr. R. C. Sproul.

“Therefore, the Jewish leaders do not charge Jesus with blasphemy before Pilate’s bench; rather, they accuse our Lord of claiming to be “King of the Jews” (Matt. 27:11–12). In riot-prone Judea, this is the best way to convince Pilate that Jesus must die, for the Roman authorities will do nearly anything to prevent uprisings against the Empire.”

Soli deo Gloria!

The Gospel of Matthew: The Charges.    

11 Now Jesus stood before the governor, and the governor asked him, “Are you the King of the Jews?” Jesus said, “You have said so.” 12 But when he was accused by the chief priests and elders, he gave no answer. 13 Then Pilate said to him, “Do you not hear how many things they testify against you?” 14 But he gave him no answer, not even to a single charge, so that the governor was greatly amazed.” Matthew 27:11–14 (ESV)

“And as soon as it was morning, the chief priests held a consultation with the elders and scribes and the whole council. And they bound Jesus and led him away and delivered him over to Pilate. And Pilate asked him, “Are you the King of the Jews?” And he answered him, “You have said so.” And the chief priests accused him of many things. And Pilate again asked him, “Have you no answer to make? See how many charges they bring against you.” But Jesus made no further answer, so that Pilate was amazed.” (Mark 15:1–5 (ESV)

Then the whole company of them arose and brought him before Pilate. And they began to accuse him, saying, “We found this man misleading our nation and forbidding us to give tribute to Caesar, and saying that he himself is Christ, a king.” And Pilate asked him, “Are you the King of the Jews?” And he answered him, “You have said so.” Then Pilate said to the chief priests and the crowds, “I find no guilt in this man.” But they were urgent, saying, “He stirs up the people, teaching throughout all Judea, from Galilee even to this place.” (Luke 23:1–5 (ESV)

28 Then they led Jesus from the house of Caiaphas to the governor’s headquarters. It was early morning. They themselves did not enter the governor’s headquarters, so that they would not be defiled, but could eat the Passover. 29 So Pilate went outside to them and said, “What accusation do you bring against this man?” 30 They answered him, “If this man were not doing evil, we would not have delivered him over to you.” 31 Pilate said to them, “Take him yourselves and judge him by your own law.” The Jews said to him, “It is not lawful for us to put anyone to death.” 32 This was to fulfill the word that Jesus had spoken to show by what kind of death he was going to die.” (John 18:28–32 (ESV)

In studying the Passion Week of the Lord Jesus Christ, it is wise to examine all four Gospel accounts. Each evangelist, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, contribute to our comprehensive understanding of our Lord’s arrest, trials, crucifixion, death and resurrection. Condemned to death by the Jewish religious authorities, Jesus subsequently faced three trials before the ruling secular authorities. This includes the Son of God’s first trial before the Roman governor, Pontius Pilate.

Luke’s Gospel alone specifically outlines the Sanhedrin’s criminal charges against the Lord Jesus Christ. “We found this man misleading our nation and forbidding us to give tribute to Caesar, and saying that he himself is Christ, a king.” (Luke 23:2). The fabricated accusations included (1) misleading the Jewish nation; (2) forbidding Jews to give tribute to Caesar; and (3) being an insurrectionist against Rome by saying He was a king.

“The first item in what may be regarded as a threefold charge was rather vague. It may perhaps be viewed as the introduction to the next two items. So construed, the total charge would be, “We have found Jesus to be a man who has been misleading our nation by forbidding people to pay taxes to Caesar and by claiming that he himself is the Messiah, and, as such, a king,” explains Dr. William Hendriksen.

“As to “forbidding us to pay taxes to Caesar,” this was a downright lie, as is clear from Luke 20:21–26 (see especially verse 25). And as to “saying that he himself is Christ, a king,” meaning “in the political sense,” another lie, for that Jesus never wanted to be king or Messiah in that sense is clear from John 6:15, as well as from his entire ministry with its strong emphasis on such qualities as humility, service, and self-denial.”

It would be the third accusation against Jesus of which Pilate would curiously interrogate the Lord.

Soli deo Gloria!

The Gospel of Matthew: Jesus before Pilate. The Fourth Trial.   

Basil Rathbone: Master of Stage and Screen - Pontius Pilate

11 Now Jesus stood before the governor, and the governor asked him, “Are you the King of the Jews?” Jesus said, “You have said so.” 12 But when he was accused by the chief priests and elders, he gave no answer. 13 Then Pilate said to him, “Do you not hear how many things they testify against you?” 14 But he gave him no answer, not even to a single charge, so that the governor was greatly amazed.” Matthew 27:11–14 (ESV)

“And as soon as it was morning, the chief priests held a consultation with the elders and scribes and the whole council. And they bound Jesus and led him away and delivered him over to Pilate. And Pilate asked him, “Are you the King of the Jews?” And he answered him, “You have said so.” And the chief priests accused him of many things. And Pilate again asked him, “Have you no answer to make? See how many charges they bring against you.” But Jesus made no further answer, so that Pilate was amazed.” (Mark 15:1–5 (ESV)

Then the whole company of them arose and brought him before Pilate. And they began to accuse him, saying, “We found this man misleading our nation and forbidding us to give tribute to Caesar, and saying that he himself is Christ, a king.” And Pilate asked him, “Are you the King of the Jews?” And he answered him, “You have said so.” Then Pilate said to the chief priests and the crowds, “I find no guilt in this man.” But they were urgent, saying, “He stirs up the people, teaching throughout all Judea, from Galilee even to this place.” (Luke 23:1–5 (ESV)

28 Then they led Jesus from the house of Caiaphas to the governor’s headquarters. It was early morning. They themselves did not enter the governor’s headquarters, so that they would not be defiled, but could eat the Passover. 29 So Pilate went outside to them and said, “What accusation do you bring against this man?” 30 They answered him, “If this man were not doing evil, we would not have delivered him over to you.” 31 Pilate said to them, “Take him yourselves and judge him by your own law.” The Jews said to him, “It is not lawful for us to put anyone to death.” 32 This was to fulfill the word that Jesus had spoken to show by what kind of death he was going to die.” (John 18:28–32 (ESV)

In studying the Passion Week of the Lord Jesus Christ, it is wise to examine all four Gospel accounts. Each evangelist, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, contribute to our comprehensive understanding of our Lord’s arrest, trials, crucifixion, death and resurrection. Condemned to death by the Jewish religious authorities, Jesus subsequently faced three trials before the ruling secular authorities.

Beginning today, we examine the Son of God’s first trial before the Roman governor, Pontius Pilate.

Following the three religious trials, the chief priests, elders and scribes along with theentire Sanhedrin council took Jesus in the early morning to the governor’s headquarters in Jerusalem. While condemning Jesus, they did not have the authority to execute Him. Only the Roman governor had that power. However, it was a delegated power from God Himself (Daniel 2:20-23; 4:34-35; Romans 13:1). Therefore, Pontius Pilate faced the One, True, all powerful God who providentially placed the Roman in his positon of power (Acts 2:22-24). What irony!

“Matthew’s gospel has highlighted the opposition of Israel’s leaders to Jesus (Matt. 2:16–18; 12:22–32; 16:1–4; 22:15–46). This hatred is seen most clearly in Christ’s trial and execution. Having had Jesus betrayed into their hands, the high priest Caiaphas and the other religious authorities have falsely convicted our Lord of blasphemy, a capital crime according to the Mosaic code (Matt. 26:47–68; 27:1; see Lev. 24:16). Since Rome does not allow the Jewish leaders to enforce the death penalty, Jesus is taken before Pontius Pilate (Matt. 27:2),” explains Dr. R. C. Sproul.

Another irony was the Jewish religious leaders refusing to enter the governor’s headquarters. This was so they would defile themselves by entering a Gentile building, thus preventing them from observing the Passover meal.

“That observant Jews (including the priestly aristocracy) would not enter this palace, lest they be defiled and thus unable to eat the Passover, fits Jewish practice. But a possible conflict with the other Gospels at this point has led to considerable debate as to when the Passover described in the Gospel passion narratives occurred. According to Matthew, Mark and Luke, Jesus had already eaten the Passover with his disciples this night; whereas according to John, the priests plan to eat it the following night,” explains commentator Craig Keener.

“Of the many explanations for the apparent discrepancy, the two most prominent are probably these: (1) Several Jewish groups had different calendars and did not celebrate Passover on the same day. A dispute about when the month had begun (based on the appearance of the new moon) would also affect when the feast would be eaten. Some scholars have suggested that Jesus’ disciples celebrated it a day early, thus without a lamb slaughtered in the temple.”

“(2) Either John or the other Gospels—probably John—is making a symbolic point (John stresses that Jesus is the Passover lamb; cf. 19:14, 36). Later Jewish tradition also reports that Jesus was crucified on Passover, but this report could be based on the approximate time in earlier tradition. Another proposal is that John here uses “Passover” loosely for the Feast of Unleavened Bread, which immediately followed; but although this usage was common, “eat the Passover” is a very odd way to speak of eating the bread during the rest of the feast,” states Keener.

Due to this cultural issue, Pilate went outside to address the Jewish leaders, hear the charges, and interrogate Jesus. It would become an infamous trial.

Soli deo Gloria!

The Gospel of Matthew: Who was Pontius Pilate?  

11 Now Jesus stood before the governor, and the governor asked him, “Are you the King of the Jews?” Jesus said, “You have said so.” 12 But when he was accused by the chief priests and elders, he gave no answer. 13 Then Pilate said to him, “Do you not hear how many things they testify against you?” 14 But he gave him no answer, not even to a single charge, so that the governor was greatly amazed.” Matthew 27:11–14 (ESV)

“And as soon as it was morning, the chief priests held a consultation with the elders and scribes and the whole council. And they bound Jesus and led him away and delivered him over to Pilate. And Pilate asked him, “Are you the King of the Jews?” And he answered him, “You have said so.” And the chief priests accused him of many things. And Pilate again asked him, “Have you no answer to make? See how many charges they bring against you.” But Jesus made no further answer, so that Pilate was amazed.” (Mark 15:1–5 (ESV)

Then the whole company of them arose and brought him before Pilate. And they began to accuse him, saying, “We found this man misleading our nation and forbidding us to give tribute to Caesar, and saying that he himself is Christ, a king.” And Pilate asked him, “Are you the King of the Jews?” And he answered him, “You have said so.” Then Pilate said to the chief priests and the crowds, “I find no guilt in this man.” But they were urgent, saying, “He stirs up the people, teaching throughout all Judea, from Galilee even to this place.” (Luke 23:1–5 (ESV)

28 Then they led Jesus from the house of Caiaphas to the governor’s headquarters. It was early morning. They themselves did not enter the governor’s headquarters, so that they would not be defiled, but could eat the Passover. 29 So Pilate went outside to them and said, “What accusation do you bring against this man?” 30 They answered him, “If this man were not doing evil, we would not have delivered him over to you.” 31 Pilate said to them, “Take him yourselves and judge him by your own law.” The Jews said to him, “It is not lawful for us to put anyone to death.” 32 This was to fulfill the word that Jesus had spoken to show by what kind of death he was going to die.” (John 18:28–32 (ESV)

In studying the Passion Week of the Lord Jesus Christ, it is wise to examine all four Gospel accounts. Each evangelist, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, contribute to our comprehensive understanding of our Lord’s arrest, trials, crucifixion, death and resurrection. Condemned to death by the Jewish religious authorities, Jesus subsequently faced three trials before the ruling secular authorities.

Beginning today, we examine the Son of God’s first trial before the Roman governor, Pontius Pilate.

Who was Pontius Pilate? Pontius Pilate was appointed by Tiberius Caesar as the fifth prefect, or governor, of Judea, Pilate served as governor from ad 26–36.

“Pontius Pilatus was a Roman of the equestrian, or upper middle-class, order: his praenomen is not known, but his nomen, Pontius, suggests that he was of Samnite extraction and his cognomen, Pilatus, may have been handed down by military forbears. Little is known of his career before ad 26, but in that year the emperor Tiberius appointed him to be the fifth praefectus (hēgemōn, Matt. 27:2, etc.; the same title is used of Felix in Acts 23 and Festus in Acts 26) of Judaea,” states the New Bible Dictionary (NBD).

“He appears prominently in the trial narratives of the Gospels as the Roman governor who authorized Jesus’ crucifixion. In addition, he appears in a variety of extra biblical sources as a dispassionate administrator who relentlessly pursued Roman authority in Judea,” states the Tyndale Bible Dictionary (TBD).

The Gospel of Luke provides additional information concerning Pilate. In Luke 13:1, several Jews tell Jesus about the Galileans whose blood Pilate had mixed with their sacrifices. This story seemingly confirms Pilate’s character, given by historians Philo and Josephus, as a ruthless administrator.

“Luke adds another detail of interest in his trial narrative. In Luke 23:12 he says that prior to the crucifixion of Jesus, Herod Antipas (in Galilee) and Pilate had been at enmity with each other. This may have stemmed not simply from Pilate’s usual antagonism but particularly from the Galilean incident,” comments the TBD.

As the Roman governor, Pilate had complete control in the province, being in charge of the occupying Roman army. The soldiers were stationed at Caesarea, with a detachment on garrison duty at Jerusalem in the fortress of Antonia. Pilate had delegated power from Caesar over life and death. He could vacate and reverse capital sentences passed by the Sanhedrin, which had to be submitted to him for approval. As governor, Pilate also appointed the high priests and controlled the Temple and its funds. In fact, the vestments of the high priest were in Pilate’s custody and were released only for festivals.

Biblically, we understand God placed Pontius Pilate in power (Psalm 2; Daniel 2 & 4; Romans 13:1). It is this One, True God Pilate would be facing.

Soli deo Gloria!

The Gospel of Matthew: Put Sin to Death.

Put to death therefore what is earthly in you: sexual immorality, impurity, passion, evil desire, and covetousness, which is idolatry. On account of these the wrath of God is coming.” (Colossians 3:5–6 (ESV)

The Word of God is not silent concerning the holiness of the believer in Christ. No matter who we are, of what we do for the kingdom of God and the church, the Lord calls each Christian to put to death what is earthly in their lives. God calls believers to be holy (I Peter 3:13-16).

The phrase put to death (νεκρόω; nekroo) is an aorist active imperative verb. It is in the plural form. This means to actively and obediently stop and completely cease a behavior and perspective of life and living. What each believer in Christ must resolve to completely cease is what is earthly (γῆ; ge) in them. The earthly is what is in harmony with the philosophy of the fallen world system of thought and action in believers’ minds, emotions and wills. This is the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life (I John 2:15-17).

The Apostle Paul briefly outlined what earthly living and desire looks like for the believer in Christ. It is gratifying sexual immorality, impurity, passion, evil desire and covetousness, which the apostle calls idolatry. These desires are not just outside of us, but rather still remain within us. These are contrary to holiness and must be killed.

“We are not yet perfectly holy in practice, and passages like Colossians 3:5–8 that call us to put sin to death exist because disobedience is a reality for us. Still, the Bible defines Christians as already holy, “sanctified . . . in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God” (1 Cor. 6:11). In Christ we have made a decisive break with unholiness. Our Creator declares us holy in His Son — we are saints of God Most High, and He sees us as pure through Jesus’ blood (Col. 1:2Heb. 9:13–14),” states Dr. R. C. Sproul.

What happens if we do not put sin to death, as God commands? The Scriptures give us ample warning and examples of the tragic wake of disobedience and compromise.

“Adam compromised God’s law and lost paradise (Genesis 3:622–24). Abraham compromised the truth, lied about Sarah’s relationship to him, and nearly lost his wife (Genesis 12:10–20). Moses compromised God’s command and lost the privilege of entering the Promised Land (Numbers 20:7–12). Samson compromised his devotion as a Nazarite and lost his strength, his eyesight, and his life (Judges 16:4–616–31). Israel compromised the commands of the Lord and lost the Ark of God (1 Samuel 4:11). Israel also compromised the law of God with idolatry and lost her land (2 Chronicles 36:14–17). Saul compromised God’s divine word by not slaying all of the animals of his enemy and lost his kingdom (1 Samuel 15:320–28). David compromised God’s standard, committed adultery with Bathsheba, murdered Uriah, and lost an infant son (2 Samuel 11:1–12:23). Solomon compromised his convictions, married foreign wives, and ultimately caused the division of the kingdom (1 Kings 11:1–8),” warns Dr. John MacArthur.

How do we go about putting sin to death? Dr. Sinclair Ferguson has some suggestions.

  1. “Learn to admit sin for what it really is. Call a spade a spade—call it “sexual immorality,” not “I’m being tempted a little”; call it “impurity,” not “I’m struggling with my thought life”; call it “evil desire, which is idolatry,” not “I think I need to order my priorities a bit better.”
  2. “See sin for what your sin really is in God’s presence. “On account of these the wrath of God is coming” (Col. 3:6). The masters of the spiritual life spoke of dragging our lusts (kicking and screaming, though they be) to the cross, to a wrath-bearing Christ. My sin leads to—not lasting pleasure—but holy divine displeasure. See the true nature of your sin in the light of its punishment.”
  3. “Recognize the inconsistency of your sin. You put off the “old man,” and have put on the “new man” (Col. 3:9–10). You are no longer the “old man.” The identity you had “in Adam” is gone. The old man was “crucified with him [Christ] in order that the body of sin [probably ‘life in the body dominated by sin’] might be brought to nothing, so that we would no longer be enslaved to sin” (Rom. 6:6). New men live new lives. Anything less than this is a contradiction of who I am “in Christ.” 
  4. Put sin to death (Col. 3:5). It is as “simple” as that. Refuse it, starve it, and reject it. You cannot “mortify” sin without the pain of the kill. There is no other way!

This is every Christian’s battle. The question is whether or not God finds us faithful to His call to holiness. Are you ready, willing and serious about putting your sin to death and being holy in practice before humankind what you are in position before God?

Soli deo Gloria!  

The Gospel of Matthew: A Few Good Men.

The integrity of the upright guides them, but the crookedness of the treacherous destroys them.” (Proverbs 11:3 (ESV)

The West Point Military Academy conducts a Protestant/Inter-denominational chapel every Sunday. During the service, cadets pray these words regarding personal integrity. “Make us to choose the harder right instead of the easier wrong, and never to be content with a half-truth when the whole can be won. Endow us with courage that is born of loyalty to all that is noble and worthy, that scorns to compromise with vice and injustice and knows no fear when truth and right are in jeopardy.”

What is integrity? Proverbs 11:3 was authored by King Solomon (Prov. 10:1). In today’s text, integrity (תֻּמָּה tum’mat) means wholeness and completeness. The English word “integrity” comes from the mathematical word integer, referring to a whole number and not a fraction. An individual of integrity is undivided in their commitment to truth and moral uprightness.

“Integrity is a steadfast adherence to a moral code. Regardless of circumstances, the man of integrity is the same person with the same convictions. He is not duplicitous or two-faced, adapting his moral character to the supposed needs of the moment. Instead, there is a simplicity to him. He is the same man at home, work, and church—before watching eyes and when he is alone,” explains Dr. John MacArthur.

“Integrity means that you live by your convictions: You know what you believe, and you act according to what you believe. And consistently so. Psalm 15:4 says that even when a man of integrity promises something “to his own hurt,” he does not change. Although it is costly, he will not be moved from his moral principles.”

Solomon wrote the integrity of the upright (יָשָׁר; ya’sar), or the straight and level individual, continually guides (נחה; tan’hem) or leads them. Within the antithetical parallelism of the proverb, the opposite is also true. The crookedness (סֶ֫לֶף se’lep) falsehood and duplicity of the treacherous (בגד; bo’ge’dim) and their untrustworthiness destroys (שׁדד; ye’sod’de), devastates and ruins lives.

“This kind of uncompromising integrity is severely lacking in men today. We repeatedly watch spiritual leaders collapse. Men abandon conviction when compromise is more beneficial. Men say they believe the Bible—but don’t faithfully preach it. Men say that sin should be punished—but not if it’s committed by their children. Men oppose corruption—until they have to confront someone and risk losing their job. Men maintain high moral standards—until their lusts are kindled by some illicit impulse. Men are honest—until a little dishonesty will save them money. Men hold convictions—until they’re challenged by someone they fear or admire,” states Dr. MacArthur.

There have been individuals in my life who I considered spiritual mentors and heroes. I respected them and appreciated their preaching, their teaching and their godly example. I’ve listened to their sermons, bought their books and supported their ministries; financially and prayerfully.

Several of them failed in their walk of integrity. While I was never disillusioned, I became deeply disappointed. I also was reminded of I Corinthians 10:12: Therefore let anyone who thinks that he stands take heed lest he fall.”

These instances, and the teaching from God’s Word, give me a holy resolved to finish well (2 Timothy 4:6-8). I do not want to become another pastoral casualty. I do not want to bring shame upon the Lord, the Gospel, my family, my colleagues, my students or my friends. I desire to be one of a few, good men. I pray there are others who possess this holy resolve as well (I Peter 1:13-16).

Soli deo Gloria!

The Gospel of Matthew: The Difference between Judas and Peter.

The following essay is by Dr. R. C. Sproul. Dr. Sproul was founder of Ligonier Ministries, first minister of preaching and teaching at Saint Andrew’s Chapel in Sanford, Fla., and first president of Reformation Bible College.

The intercession of our Great High Priest is the foundation for our confidence when it comes to our perseverance. It also helps us make sense of the accounts of Peter and Judas, two of Jesus’ disciples who experienced a serious fall. One disciple’s fall away from Christ is seen as a final and full work of apostasy, whereas the other disciple’s fall is not final and full because he is restored. And we see that their crime against Christ was very similar. Judas betrayed Jesus. And that same night, Peter denied Christ.

These two men who had been disciples with Jesus during His earthly ministry committed treason against Him in His darkest hour. And there are further similarities in these two examples in that Jesus predicted both Peter’s and Judas’ diabolical acts. But we recall that when Jesus said, “One of you will betray me,” the disciples said among themselves, “Who is it, Lord? Is it I?” When Judas asked, “Is it I, Rabbi?” Jesus said to him, “You have said so” (Matt. 26:25). Jesus’ final words to Judas were “What you are going to do, do quickly” (John 13:27). And He dismissed him from their presence.

When Jesus prophesied that Peter would deny Him, Peter protested profusely. “Though they all fall away because of you, I will never fall away,” he said (Matt. 26:33). This brings to mind Paul’s admonition, “Let anyone who thinks that he stands take heed lest he fall” (1 Cor. 10:12), because Jesus then turned to Simon and said to him in loving terms, “Simon, Simon, behold, Satan demanded to have you, that he might sift you like wheat” (Luke 22:31).

Sifting wheat is not a laborious task that only the strong can perform. It may take time and it may be tedious, but it’s not labor intensive. In using this metaphor, Jesus is cautioning Simon not to rely on his own strength, because it would be an easy thing for Satan to entice him to fall. Satan is stronger than Peter, and would have no trouble overcoming whatever strength Peter thought he had.

Notice, however, that Jesus does not say to Peter, “What you are going to do, do quickly.” Our Lord’s words to Simon Peter were significantly different from what He said to Judas. He said, “I have prayed for you that your faith may not fail. And when you have turned again, strengthen your brothers” (Luke 22:32).

Notice what Jesus doesn’t say. He doesn’t simply hope that Peter will be able to resist Satan, or that he will return, or that he will be able to strengthen the brothers. He expresses certainty that Peter will do these things. There was no doubt in Jesus’ mind not only that Peter would fall, and fall abysmally, but also that Peter would be restored. Indeed, history testifies that Peter, in spite of this radical and serious fall, nevertheless endured to the end. He repented, he was forgiven, he was restored, and he endured to the end.

Soli deo Gloria!